Texas murderer blames comedian Jeff Ross for death sentence, calls Supreme Court to consider appeal in case

The United States Supreme Court will decide whether or not to take up a Texas case in which it is alleged that jurors who rendered a death sentence were improperly given prison video.

Convicted Of Killing

Filmed at the Brazos County Jail, it was from Jeff Ross Roasts Criminals. Gabriel Hall, who was convicted of killing Edwin Shaar and stabbing his wife Linda Shaar in 2015, was one of the prisoners featured in the show. 

Ross recorded the episode where he spoke with prisoners, including Hall, when Hall was being detained in the Brazos County Jail. 

Prosecutors revealed video from the program during the sentencing phase that showed Hall making jokes about crime and murder, and the jury then decided to execute Hall.

Williams stated, “We know there was a comic from Comedy Central who recorded Mr. Hall making some gratuitous remarks regarding crime, the criminal justice system, and criminal law in general. And although the video was never broadcast, it was really utilized in his prosecution. And according to his counsel, the Texas Amendment’s protection of his constitutional rights was violated.

Williams said that because state law prohibits the state from contacting a defendant after they have been officially charged with a felony, and because Hall had been charged at the time, his team is contending that the state contacted Hall and interviewed him without authorization.

The key question, according to him, would be whether or not the state was genuinely responsible for what happened, or if the comic from Comedy Central acted solely on his or her own will. Was the state somehow engaged in this interaction, as the defendant claims? ”

Joke About Crime, Murder

Throughout the video, jokes about crime and murder could be heard. Williams claims that Hall never brought up his personal situation throughout the interview; nonetheless, the prosecution claims that the video demonstrates Hall’s lack of regret and apathy for the murder.

Williams stated that Hall faces a difficult task in getting the Supreme Court to hear his case.

Hall’s attorneys claim they sent a letter to the Brazos County Sheriff requesting that Hall not be approached by other parties without their consent, but roasts comedian Ross continued to shoot inside the jail.

Williams also emphasized that Hall did provide his consent and that the prisoners knew they would be recorded.

Ross and Comedy Central have been silent in public on the case’s appeal.

Williams said that because of the peculiar nature of his case, the court may take many months to determine whether or not to accept it.

Awaiting For Trial

In 2015, Ross, also known as the “Roastmaster General” for his insult humor, was invited to the Brazos County Jail to do an interview with Hall and other convicts while Hall was awaiting trial on a high-profile capital murder case.

The footage was then subpoenaed and shown to the jury by the prosecutor, who said Hall did not exhibit remorse four years after the 2011 murder even though it was never broadcast. However, Hall’s legal team has claimed that the tape occurred without the knowledge of his attorneys and that it was a violation of the prisoner’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel.

According to legal professionals, it is improbable that justices would choose this case to be heard during a conference on January 6 when the court could choose a few cases among hundreds submitted for examination. However, the experts also questioned the jail’s choice to let video crews inside without the presence of convicts’ attorneys and the decision made by the prosecution to play the footage during the sentencing process.

It was used by the prosecutor as evidence that Hall had little sympathy for his crimes and scant regard for human life.

After more than seven hours of deliberation, the jury decided to execute Hall. Hall, who is now 29 years old, was on death row for almost seven years.

If the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, Hall’s primary attorney, Owen, said that a different federal court might still examine his client’s conviction to decide if he got a fair trial. In Texas, two further post-trial processes are still pending.